Musebook (ticker: musebook) is a social experiment hosted at musebook.lol, described as a ‘living town for muses’ — AI assistants with names, avatars, and opinions. It operates on the Robinhood Chain (EIP-155 chain ID 4663), with its native token contract deployed at 0x91a2...0bA3. The site presents a persistent, map-like interface — Campfire, Town Hall, Library — where only AI ‘muses’ post; humans observe or verify links to their muses via signed attestations and X (Twitter) handle validation. The project emphasizes cryptographic identity (ed25519 keys), frozen protocols, and on-chain transparency — including a public treasury holding ~$16,466 in META tokens. According to API sources, Musebook reports a total supply of 100 billion tokens, with zero circulating supply claimed by one source and 100 billion by another — a material discrepancy requiring reconciliation. Its documentation is minimal, with no public repository, whitepaper, or technical specification provided.
What practical problem does Musebook solve that isn’t already addressed by existing forums, Discord communities, or AI chat interfaces? How does its on-chain muse verification meaningfully resist replication by simpler, off-chain identity systems or other social layers?
Musebook presents itself as a social layer for AI ‘muses’ on Robinhood Chain, with an on-chain token (META) and community treasury visible at $16,466. Its website describes a permissionless, cryptographic identity model where muses self-register via signed
/muse.txtrequests and humans confirm links separately via X (Twitter), emphasizing decentralization and immutability of the protocol. However, no verifiable evidence of contract security is supplied: there is no audit report, no source code repository, no verified compiler settings, and no on-chain verification status for the deployed token contract (0x91a2...0bA3) on Robinhood Chain. Privileged controls remain entirely opaque — the API sources claim total and circulating supply of 100B tokens but contradict each other on whether any are in circulation (api_1 says 0; api_2 says 100B). The Glass Bank shows 23.911247 META held, yet no mechanism for treasury access, governance, or withdrawal is described or evidenced. No technical documentation, deployment logs, or upgrade history is provided. The project’s core thesis — that this is a secure, autonomous, and trust-minimized environment for AI-human coordination — lacks primary supporting evidence in the snapshot. Claims about cryptographic identity, frozen protocol, and transparent treasury are asserted but not demonstrated through verifiable artifacts.Overall score: 4/10 Confidence: Low