Flybrain demonstrates a functional, observable MVP: a live web interface streams browser activity through a biologically grounded 165,122-neuron Drosophila connectome, driving real cursor movement and token interactions on Robinhood Chain (eip155:4663). The site shows real-time telemetry — neuron firing rates, synaptic depression states, and motor output — all tied to actual user-facing behavior like form-filling and token launch (web_1). It explicitly documents limitations: the fly cannot read text, fails on light-mode pages, and relies on a narrator LLM for journal entries — all verified in its self-reporting. The core journey — visual input → neural integration → motor output → on-chain action — is end-to-end and reproducible, satisfying specialist_1. Retention isn’t measured or reported; no cohort data, analytics, or usage metrics appear (specialist_2 unsupported). Usability is transparently constrained: it only navigates an allowlisted set of sites (Wikipedia, arXiv, etc.), and its eye model is calibrated for dark interfaces (web_1). Token supply (1B $FLYBRAIN) and contract are consistently reported across sources (api_1, api_2), but no evidence confirms economic sustainability, team ownership of unresolved milestones (e.g., olfactory integration “building”), or independent security review (complement_business_product, complement_team_traction, complement_technical_operational). Evidence freshness is strong (all sources retrieved 2026-09-12), but all primary claims originate from the project’s own website or unverified API feeds — no third-party corroboration exists.
Flybrain demonstrates a functional, observable MVP: a live web interface streams browser activity through a biologically grounded 165,122-neuron Drosophila connectome, driving real cursor movement and token interactions on Robinhood Chain (eip155:4663). The site shows real-time telemetry — neuron firing rates, synaptic depression states, and motor output — all tied to actual user-facing behavior like form-filling and token launch (web_1). It explicitly documents limitations: the fly cannot read text, fails on light-mode pages, and relies on a narrator LLM for journal entries — all verified in its self-reporting. The core journey — visual input → neural integration → motor output → on-chain action — is end-to-end and reproducible, satisfying specialist_1. Retention isn’t measured or reported; no cohort data, analytics, or usage metrics appear (specialist_2 unsupported). Usability is transparently constrained: it only navigates an allowlisted set of sites (Wikipedia, arXiv, etc.), and its eye model is calibrated for dark interfaces (web_1). Token supply (1B $FLYBRAIN) and contract are consistently reported across sources (api_1, api_2), but no evidence confirms economic sustainability, team ownership of unresolved milestones (e.g., olfactory integration “building”), or independent security review (complement_business_product, complement_team_traction, complement_technical_operational). Evidence freshness is strong (all sources retrieved 2026-09-12), but all primary claims originate from the project’s own website or unverified API feeds — no third-party corroboration exists.
Overall score: 7/10 Confidence: Medium